Legal Opinion

Reed v. Fenn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 12, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal in each case by the defendants, Albert O. Fenn and . others, from an order, made at the Monroe- Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Monroe, granting a commission upon oral questions to designated witnesses on the application of the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

Spring, J.:

Each action is to recover a large sum, being the purchase price of bonds, upon the ground that the investment was induced by the fraudulent representations of the defendants.

An.order to show cause was granted upon the application of the plaintiff, returnable at a Special Term of this court on the 30tli day of April, 1910, why an order should not be made directing the issuance of a commission to Sears Lehman,-of the city of St. Louis,

in the State' of Missouri, for the examination of five designated witnesses residing in said city. Affidavits in opposition to the application were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deery v. ByrneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. Gowans v. JobbinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Ingham v. Herkimer County Light & Power Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dayton v. FarmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. MacDonald v. Hamilton B. Wills & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API