Legal Opinion
Altsheler v. Board of Education
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 1, 1984PublishedCited by 12 opinions
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
1Opinion of the Court
*657OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be reversed, without costs, and respondent’s determination reinstated.
On review of the entire record, it is concluded that there is “such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion” (300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180) that petitioner improperly disclosed to her pupils words on which they were to be tested on a standard achievement test and thus distorted the comparative value of those tests.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by12 opinions
- Burkes v. Enlarged City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- McSweeney v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Board of Education of Hyde Park Central School District v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Burkes v. Enlarged City School District of Troy Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Earles v. Pine Bush Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.