Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Richter

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 2002PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

¶ 1 This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from an order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County granting Appellee Karen Lee Richter’s motion to suppress the physical evidence seized by the police. On appeal, the Commonwealth alleges that the warrantless, unannounced entry of the police into Ap-pellee Richter’s residence was warranted by exigent circumstances and the “knock and announce” rule was not violated.1 We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Our scope of review when considering the Commonwealth’s appeal of a suppression order is narrow:

[W]e must consider only the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. BeasleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. SantiagoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. WhitingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. GutierrezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CapleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Com. v. King, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Com. v. Boden, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Com. v. Darr, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API