Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schulberg v. Hirsch

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1975No. Appeal, 54PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Price, J.,

This is an appeal from an order refusing to suspend the support obligation of appellant, Zola Hirsch, toward his twenty-one-year-old son, Gary.

The facts reveal that the parties to the action were formerly husband and wife, parents of Gary and an older daughter. 1 Gary became 21 on April 24, 1974. On July 19, 1974, appellant filed a rule to show cause why his support obligation should not be suspended. An ex parte hearing was held before Judge Finkelhor on July 81, 1974, at which, on the advice of a Family Division Counselor that such a suspension was “routine,” appellant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MinnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. O'Malley v. O'MalleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Welsh v. WelshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Colantoni v. ColantoniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Moss v. MossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Reifinger v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Verna v. VernaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Brake v. BrakeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Caswell v. CaswellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API