Legal Opinion

United States v. Patiwana

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided May 8, 2003No. 85CR0175NGRMLPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

GERSHON, District Judge.

Two motions to quash subpoenas were referred to Magistrate Judge Levy. His Report and Recommendation of November 15, 2002, recommends that each be denied. As to one of the motions, designated by Judge Levy Patiwana Motion II, there have been no objections to Judge Levy’s recommendation that it be denied. As to the other, designated Patiwana Motion I. Rajan Patiwana and Maria Brodsky have filed objections. Upon de novo review pursuant to Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, I find that the objections are without merit.

The movants’ principal argument…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard Coluccio, Theresa Coluccio, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. RiceDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2002
  3. United States v. ChapdelaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. EnigweDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API