Legal Opinion

Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 17, 1986No. 84-1638PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WALD, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company (“Southern Bell”) challenges an order of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC” or “Commission”) prescribing depreciation rates. In 1983, the Commission set Southern Bell’s depreciation rates in accordance with the “remaining life” method first adopted in a 1980 rulemaking. Southern Bell had requested higher depreciation rates based on a method which would more rapidly write down depreciation reserve deficiencies accumulated during previous years. We hold that the FCC’s decision to adhere to the remaining life…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Thomas Radio Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  4. North Texas Media, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Denton Fm Radio, Ltd., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southern Bell Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API