Legal Opinion

Claim of Holck v. Town of Hempstead—District No. 2

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1979PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Claimant was injured while playing soccer outside his place of employment during a lunch break. His claim for compensation was disallowed by the Workers’ Compensation Board, and the Appellate Division affirmed.

There is no basis for disturbing the board’s decision. Whether claimant’s noontime recreational activity was an incident of employment so as to arise out of and in the course of employment is a question of fact (see, e.g., Matter of Brown v United Servs. for Air, 298 NY 901, affg 273 App…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Brown v. United Services for Air, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Claim of Brown v. United Services for Air, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. Claim of Beiring v. Niagara Frontier Transit System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kloer v. Municipality of Las VegasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API