Himeles v. Rose
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Henderson, J.,
The court refused to enter judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense; hence this appeal. The action is assumpsit for damages resulting from the alleged refusal of the defendant to perform that part of an agreement in writing for the sale of a certain parcel of real estate in Philadelphia, by the defendant to the plaintiff, wherein the former agreed to procure a mortgage on the premises for the plaintiff without cost to him, for the sum of $8,000, payable in three years. This the defendant did not do, because of which default the plaintiff was subjected to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Flegal v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Dreifus v. Columbian Exposition Salvage Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Robert Grace Contracting Co. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Holloway v. FrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Germantown Dairy Co. v. McCallumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kirk v. Brentwood Manor Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Cheponis' EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- DeLong Hook & Eye Co. v. Vogue Silk Hosiery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Gallagher v. WoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Graboyes v. KapnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.