Legal Opinion · Dissent

Todd v. Peloso

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 31, 1984No. CA 84-370Published

1DissentTom Glaze, Judge

I would grant the petitioner’s stay and request for certiorari. Apparently, I struck a nerve in writing this dissent since Judges Cooper and Cracraft have belatedly and subsequently decided to write concurrences. I need only say, in response, that both my colleagues simply avoid the primary point of my dissent — that this Court ruled in this appeal without a complete record. As a consequence, the parties’ petition, response and accompanying briefs are replete with affidavits and other hearsay attachments in order to make a record. In sum, both concurrences are based upon rank hearsay…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Lipsey v. BattleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  3. Peloso v. BotkinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  4. In re ByronSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  5. Waldron v. ChildersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API