Legal Opinion

Shaw v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 3, 1993No. 91-03551PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Acting Chief Judge.

Shaw contends the written reasons for his departure sentence are invalid. He also contends he has been illegally forced to pay his debt to society intermittently and that he is entitled to credit for time he spent on detainer for another offense. Though we find no merit in Shaw’s last two contentions, we agree that the written reasons for his departure sentence are invalid.

In February 1988, Shaw pled guilty to charges of burglary of a structure and possession of burglary tools. At that time, he was placed on two years’ community control. Upon violation thereof, Shaw’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ree v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. Barfield v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  4. State v. LylesSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  5. Lippman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cordes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Tesney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API