Legal Opinion

Litrenta v. New Hampshire Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 4, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action brought by the insured to recover for property damages under an insurance policy, the defendant New Hampshire Insurance Co. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Miller, J.) dated May 5, 1992, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment in its favor.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the cross motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

On January 31, 1987, the roof of the insured’s building collapsed. The report of the insured’s own expert, dated the same day,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Government Employees Insurance v. KliglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WestlakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Acorn Ponds, Inc. v. Hartford InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Johnson v. Home Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Napanoch Realty Corp. v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API