Legal Opinion

Goldfine v. Sichenzia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 13, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants Catherine N. Coughlin, Terence M. Coughlin, and Artesian Abstract, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), dated June 3, 2003, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion, in effect, to strike their answer to the extent of precluding them from contesting the plaintiffs’ claims unless they produced certain documents within 20 days.

*412Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in directing the appellants to produce certain…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kingsley v. KantorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Pashayan v. CorsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goldfine v. SichenziaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API