State v. Dandridge

Defendant, Elsie Mae Dandridge, was convicted and sentenced for the crime of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. She has appealed. We affirm.

Her sole assigned error is that her motion for new trial should have been sustained. She contends her motion for directed verdict should not have been overruled and argues the State failed to prove all the essential elements of the crime charged, particularly intent to deliver.

In considering sufficiency of evidence to sustain the verdict, we give the State’s case the most favorable interpretation it will bear, including all…