Bluestein v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtAdlerman, J.
By the defendant’s failure to attach the application for insurance to the policy in suit, it is precluded from grounding any defense on misrepresentations as to the sound health of the insured contained in the application. (Bible v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co., 256 N. Y. 458, 462.) In said case Cardozo, Ch. J., said: “ The defendant procured applications from *123the insured, but did not attach them to the policies. What was in them we do not know, and we must act as if they had never been.” The policy in the case at bar was solicited by one Max Von Boeckmann, defendant’s agent, who was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bible v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Whipple v. . Prudential Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Ames v. Manhattan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Ames v. . Manhattan Life Insurance Company of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fredella v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939