Legal Opinion

Barks v. Bi-State Development Agency

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1987No. 52221PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMEONE, Senior Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Wayne E. Barks, appeals from a judgment of the circuit court of the City of St. Louis granting defendant-respondent, Bi-State Development Agency’s motion for summary judgment on appellant’s alleged claim for damages for wrongful discharge for exercising his rights under the Missouri Workers’ Compensation Law. We affirm.

Barks was an employee of Bi-State from June 23, 1977 through July, 1981. He was employed as “bus cleaner.” He had earlier been a “bus mover.” The duties of bus *465cleaners included sweeping floors in the maintenance sheds and emptying…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Cherry v. City of Hayti HeightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marriage of Johnson v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Cook v. Hussmann Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Smithey v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API