Legal Opinion

Ennis v. Clancy

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 25, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The motion to set aside the verdict was properly denied. The plaintiff offered evidence tending to prove the allegations of the complaint, which were that the plaintiff rendered services to the defendant’s intestate at her request and upon her promise to pay for the same, and in consideration of such services agreed that she would compensate the plaintiff by provision in her will, and that these services were reasonably worth $10,000.

The complaint may be construed to set up two causes of action. One based upon facts indicating that the services rendered were such as to give rise to a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
  2. Wainwright v. TalcottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  3. Cotter v. CotterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  4. Boardman Realty Co. v. CarlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Devita v. Sirico, No. Cv 01-0448826s (Mar. 13, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
  2. Jacobs v. TallmadgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API