Legal Opinion

Creps v. City of Columbia

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 29, 1916No. 9407PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Before Mauldin, J., Columbia, March, 1916. Action by Dawson E. Creps and Corrie Creps against City of Columbia to recover damages for personal injuries. From order overruling demurrer to complaint, defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion. cites: Civil Code, secs. 3053, 2952; 43 S. C. 398; 58 S. C. 413; 66 S. C. 448 ; 70 S. C. 137; 89 S. C. 511; 94 S. C. 375; 100 S. C. 304. cites: 89 S. C. 511; 71 S. C. 170.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs against the defendant to recover damages for injury received by the plaintiff, Corrie Creps, through the alleged carelessness and negligence of the driver of one of the defendant’s fire engines in allowing the horses drawing the fire engine to run over and hurt the plaintiff, Corrie Creps.

The complaint is brought on section 3053, vol. I, Code of Laws 1912, and the allegations of the complaint are appropriate to said section. The complaint, among other things, alleges that the defendant was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hutchison v. Town of SummervilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  2. Bryant v. City Council of OrangeburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  2. Rollow v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Reeves v. City of EasleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  4. Triplett v. City of CoulumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  5. Burnett v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API