Legal Opinion

McFarland v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 25, 1996No. 954-95PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.

A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated robbery and sentenced him to seventy-five years’ imprisonment. The Court of Appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the case after finding that the State’s jury argument did not fall into one of the permissible categories of jury argument and that it denied the appellant the right to a fair and impartial trial. McFarland v. State, 902 S.W.2d 540 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1995). We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review.

Upon further…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. McFarland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Mayer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Rankin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Moore, Jammie LeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  4. Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  5. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API