Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Smith

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall County. Bill by B. Walker Peterson against Henry L. Smith and others. Prom decree dismissing his bill complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, PResident :

By the appeal herein, plaintiff submits that his bill was improperly dismissed on demurrer. But mature consideration leads us to sustain the ruling of the chancellor holding the bill insufficient.

The bill seeks an accounting for oil royalty. The substance of the ease which it presents, is that defendant Smith has *554been paid, by mistake of the operating company, royalty which belongs to plaintiff. For the royalty so paid, plaintiff asserts a mere money demand against Smith. The bill shows no ground of equity cognizance. It does not make a case for an accounting. It appears…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peterson v. HallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Frye v. MileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Grafton v. ReedWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Teter v. TeterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Smith v. Linden Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Capehart v. ChurchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Amick v. Gauley Coal Land Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Keller v. Model Coal CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Keller v. Model Coal CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API