Legal Opinion

Pence v. Armstrong

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1883No. 9628Published

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion

On Petition for a Rehearing.

Elliott, J.

It is contended in the argument on the petition for a rehearing, that the opinion heretofore pronounced does not correctly lay down the law upon the subject of subrogation. Counsel affirm that a replevin bail upon a personal judgment rendered on a debt secured by mortgage can not be subrogated to the mortgage lien, in cases where the creditor acquires a junior mortgage upon the same property. This position is not tenable.

The general rule is that where a replevin bail pays a judg*205ment, he is entitled to the benefit of all securities held by the creditor.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lapping v. DuffyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Gerber v. SharpIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Evansville Gas-Light Co. v. State ex rel. ReitzIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Teal v. HinchmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Vert v. VossIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API