Legal Opinion

Platt v. Richmond, York River & Chesapeake R. R.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1888PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the general term of the superior court of New York city affirming a judgment in favor of the defendant, entered upon a verdict directed by the court at the trial term.

1Opinion of the CourtEarl, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff' against the defendant as a common carrier to recover for the loss of sixty-five bales of - cotton delivered to it and alleged to have been destroyed and lost through its gross negligence and fault while in its possession. The answer of the defendant, besides denying any negligence on its part, alleges that the cotton was received for transportation by it under bills of lading exempting it from all liability from loss by fire not caused by its negligence, and that the-cotton was not lost or-destroyed through any fault or negligence chargeable to it.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phœnix Insurance v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Lamb v. Camden & Amboy Railroad & Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. National Garment Co. v. New York, C. & St. LR Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  2. Weld v. . Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. EMPLOYERS'FIRE INSURANCE CO., BOSTON, MASS. v. BehuninDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1967
  4. Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. Security Union Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. American Surety Co. v. Town of IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API