Legal Opinion

United States v. Hairup

District Court, D. Utah

Decided February 20, 2008No. 2:07-cv-00566PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DEE BENSON, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Melynda Jonelle Hairup’s Motion to Dismiss Count 31 of the Indictment pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b)(2) and DUCrimR12-l. Count 31 of the Indictment charges Defendant with aggravated identity theft in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1). Defendant argues that under no set of circumstances do her alleged acts satisfy the mens rea requirement of this statute and, therefore, this count should be dismissed.

Background

On August 29, 2007, Defendant was named in three counts of a thirty-three…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Adamo Wrecking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. HurtadoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Estrada-SanchezDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API