Legal Opinion
Shoemake v. Union Pacific Railroad
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided October 31, 2002No. 1:02-cv-00359PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION
RADFORD, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company’s (“Union Pacific”) Motion to Transfer Venue to the Western District of Louisiana, Lake Charles Division [docket #6]. Plaintiff, William Shoemake, has filed his Response to Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company’s Motion to Transfer Venue [#7].
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This case arises out of alleged injuries that Plaintiff sustained on August 21, 2001, while working as a conductor/switchman for Union Pacific. See Plaintiffs Original Complaint [# 1]; Joint…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hanby v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2001
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. Medallion Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2012
- EMPTY BARGE LINES II v. Dredge Leonard FisherDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
- Powerhouse Productions, Inc. v. WidgeryDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2008
- Ray Mart, Inc. v. Stock Building Supply of Texas, L.P.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
- Ferguson v. Lockheed Martin CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2023
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.