Rheuban v. Commercial Investment Trust, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiff’s evidence tended to prove the following facts: July 12, 1921, George J. Rheuban purchased of the New Hampshire Auto Company of Manchester an automobile. Only a portion of the consideration was paid, and George gave his note for the balance payable in twelve monthly instalments. The payment .of this note was secured by a conditional sale contract. August 1, 1921, George was notified by the defendants that they had purchased his note. He understood when he gave the note that it was to be transferred to the defendants, and he was informed by his vendors that the contract price for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dustin v. CurtisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907
- Buch v. Amory Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1897
- Benoit v. PerkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918
- Pittsfield Cottonwear Manufacturing Co. v. Pittsfield Shoe Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
- Platts v. AuclairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tonini v. ThurmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Broyles v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1941