Legal Opinion

Sass v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 12, 2008No. 08-1806Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Kenneth Sass challenges the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board ordering him to repay $34,946 in excess benefits and a $51,005 penalty. Because the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and has a reasonable basis in law, we uphold the decision.

Sass was 51 when he began receiving a disability annuity in 1991. Until recently, a disability annuitant like Sass could not earn more than $400 per month in wages or self-employment income without a reduction in benefits (the amount is now $700), and annuitants who exceed this cap must notify the agency. 45 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Railway Labor Executives' Association v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. Wallace M. Crown v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Curtis R. Peterson v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. Roger D. Holman v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  5. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API