Legal Opinion

In re Alexander

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1927Published

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

A bull belonging to the petitioner was slaughtered under the provisions of the Farms and Markets Law, having been found to be tubercular.

The relief that the petitioner seeks is a peremptory mandamus order directing the Commissioner of Farms and Markets to make an immediate award and pay to him the appraised value of said bull named McKinley Lyons Piebe No. 28 as a pure and registered Holstein-Friesian animal, or for an alternative mandamus order, if that should appear to be more appropriate.

On November 25, 1926, upon a form provided by the New York State Department of Farms and Markets, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Francis v. . Common CouncilNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. People Ex Rel. Hotchkiss v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. In re BeckleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API