Legal Opinion

Lingle v. Lingle

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 7, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Olarlte District Court. — Hon. R. L. Pakrish, Judge. A will contest. Trial to a jury, and verdict and jutlg-enmt for the contestant. The proponents appeal. — >

1Opinion of the CourtShebwxN, J.

The contestant alleged that the testatrix was mentally incapable of making a valid will, and that the will was procured by the duress and undue influence of the proponents. The record presents no evidence which would warrant a jury or a court in finding that the testatrix was mentally incapable of disposing- of her property by will. Her advanced age and physical infirmities when the will was executed were not alone sufficient to prove such total disability mentally. Evidence as to her mental and physical condition at the time the will was made was admissible, however, on the issue of undue…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kirsher v. KirsherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Ellis v. LeonardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Stein v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gates v. ColeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. In re Estate of SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  3. In re the Estate of BerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  4. In Re Estate of EnsmingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  5. Geddes v. McElroySupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API