Legal Opinion

Zollicoffer v. Briggs

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 15, 1842PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The plaintiff is appellant from a judgment of the District Court of Concordia, Tenney, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBullard, J.

The appellees move to dismiss this appeal on the ground that there is no legal statement of facts, no bill of exceptions, and no such assignment of errors as will enable the court .to test the correctness of the judgment below.

This motion must be overruled. The assignment of errors is sufficient to call our attention to the alleged error which appears upon the record. It is in substance, that the exception to the petition, on the ground that it was not signed, was improperly sustained and the suit dismissed, because it appears that the affidavit, which was annexed to. and formed a part of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zollikoffer v. Briggs, Lacoste & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1841

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. NicolosiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. Chopin v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. English v. WallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API