Legal Opinion · Dissent

William Joyce v. Federated National Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 19, 2017No. SC16-103Published

1DissentCanady, J.

Because competent, substantial evidence does not support the trial court’s use of a multiplier in this case, I would approve the result reached by the Fifth District. I agree that the Fifth District misstated this Court’s case law regarding the application of the contingency fee multiplier. But because the multiplier was used without sufficient justification under the requirements of our case law, the district court nonetheless reached the correct result in reversing the fee award. The record here does not support the conclusion that the availability of the multiplier was necessary for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. QuanstromSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  5. Bell v. USB Acquisition Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API