Franz v. Buder
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
FARIS, District Judge.
The matters before the Court have to do with many motions and exceptions, made and filed by divers parties to the cause, and others, or, at least, one other, namely, the State of Missouri, which comes in by way of an intervention for its own interest, or alleged interest.
I see no reason why, the whole matter, and all of the motions, interventions and exceptions may not be fully dealt with in a single oral opinion, bottomed upon which the various necessary orders may be settled, signed and entered. All of the motions, matters and things before me are so inextricably…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gibbons v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Williams v. NeelyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Hayes v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- Nutter v. AndrewsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Richter & Co. v. LightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Franz EstateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Saulsbury v. Denton National BankCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Scott v. RoperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Scott v. RoperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985