Legal Opinion

Hanaina Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided October 21, 1992No. 92-1871-CIVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR STAY OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION

HIGHSMITH, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff Hanaina Enterprises, Inc. ("Hanaina”) motion for stay of administrative action, pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 2023. On August 31, 1992, the Court held an evidentiary hearing on this matter. For the reasons stated below, the Court denies Hanaina’s motion.

STATUTORY FRAMEWORK

Hanaina, a local grocer doing business as Summerland Supermarket, brought this ac*262tion for judicial review of a final decision by the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) permanently…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Elsie Inez Goodman, Owner Goodman's Drive-In Grocery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. In the Matter of Farouk Ibrahim, D/B/A Onondaga Circle Market v. United States of America, Acting Through the Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. Bruno's, Inc., a Corporation, Birmingham, Jefferson County, Alabama, Plaintiff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Ibrahim v. United States Ex Rel. Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1987
  5. De La Nueces v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Amer v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
  2. Harris v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API