Tomaier v. Tomaier
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.
Appellant wife appeals from a judgment granting respondent husband a divorce upon the ground of extreme cruelty, and making a division of the property of the parties. Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the finding of cruelty on her part, and that she was entitled to a divorce on her cross-complaint on the ground of desertion.
No useful purpose would be served by setting forth the somewhat sordid evidence in the case on the charges of cruelty and on the counter charge of desertion. No hard and fast rule of law can be laid down as to what…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Barnes v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Estate of HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Hansen v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Shaw v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Emery v. EmeryMontana Supreme Court · 1948
- Ungemach v. UngemachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Estate of TaitmeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Kaupe v. KaupeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.