Stevens v. Pantlind
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Osceola. (Judkins, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The iacts are stated in the opinion, and in 87 Mich. 476.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The terms of the lease involving the questions now raised are stated in 87 Mich. 476. The evidence there given is also substantially the same as in the present record, which, in addition, contains evidence, given on the part of plaintiff, tending to ■show that at the time of the alleged surrender of the property to plaintiff there were logs in the mill-yard, lumber and slabs in the mill, and lumber upon the docks and in the yard. The evidence will be referred to in connection with the legal questions to be determined.
*1471. Tlie court left it to the jury to determine whether the. lease was in fact…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stevens v. PantlindMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mason v. HowesMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Reliance Insurance v. East-Lind Heat Treat, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989