John F. Comstock & Co. v. Affœlter
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Carroll Circuit Court. Tie delivery of goods to a carrier, for tie purpose of transferring them to tie purchaser, is a delivery to the purchaser. (2 Kent’s Com. 499.)
1Opinion of the CourtBliss, Judge
This suit was for the price of a hill of goods alleged to have been sold and delivered to defendant, and the only controversy is in regard to the delivery. The plaintiff’s salesman and traveling agent testified that he called upon defendant at Carrollton and sold the goods ; that the understanding was that they were to be shipped so that they would be received in less time than by river, and that they were shipped at once by the Merchants’ Union Express Company. • He also spoke of having sold another bill o£ goods which was paid for, and which had been shipped by the river. The defendant…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Graff v. FosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
- Bloom's Son Co. v. HaasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
- Meyer Bros. Drug Co. v. McMahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
- Charles v. LasherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
- Tuttle & Pike v. Bracey-Howard Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.