Legal Opinion

Tyson v. Cheek Mechanical & Electrical Service, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 6, 1995No. A95A0612PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

Appellant Clelland Tyson d/b/a Misty Mills, Inc. (“Tyson”), appeals a jury verdict and judgment in favor of Cheek Mechanical & Electrical Service, Inc. (“Cheek”). Cheek filed a suit on account against Tyson, contending Tyson owed $18,150.55 for services rendered in the installation of a chicken litter processor designed by Tyson. Tyson did not provide Cheek with engineering plans to install the equipment. The system did not work to Tyson’s expectation, and Tyson hired another contractor.

In answer to Cheek’s suit, Tyson asserted accord and satisfaction, failure of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bourquin v. BourquinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Anderson v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  3. B & C Tire & Battery, Inc. v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Rawdin v. ConnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  5. Glisson v. Bankers Health C. Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carter v. MurpheyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API