Legal Opinion
Muller v. Triborough Bridge Authority
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 14, 1942PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action for an infringement of a copyright of an unpublished work, described in the application for the copyright as “Bridge Approach — The drawing shows a novel bridge approach to unsnarl traffic congestion”. The application for the copyright was filed, pursuant to Section 11 of the Copyright Act, 17 U. S.C.A. § 11, as an unpublished work, that is, a work of which “copies are not reproduced for sale”. The copyright was registered December 10, 1929, in the United States Copyright Office at Washington, D. C. The application for the registration…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Baker v. SeldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Guthrie v. CurlettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Brief English Systems, Inc. v. OwenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Griggs v. PerrinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1892
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Robert R. Jones Associates, Inc. v. Nino Homes, Michele Lochirco, Diebele-GinterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Demetriades v. KaufmannDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- DeSilva Construction Corp. v. HerraldDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1962
- Taylor Instrument Companies v. Fawley-Brost Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.