Legal Opinion

Breyfogle v. Stotsenburg

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1897No. 18,201PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, C. J.

The appellee, as the assignee for the benefit of creditors of the New Albany Banking Company. sued the appellants in the Floyd Circuit Court to collect an indebtedness of $146,076.44, evidenced by six promissory notes executed by said defendants, and by them also as the firm of Winstandley & Co., and to obtain an order for the sale of 812 1-2 shares of the capital stock of the Peerless Manufacturing Company, of Louisville, Kentucky, and 490 shares of 'the capital stock of the Little Falls Water Power Company, of Little Falls, in the state of Minnesota, represented by variously numbered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gregory v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Snyder v. State ex rel. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Moffitt v. RocheIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Orb v. CoapstickIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Johnson School Township v. Citizens BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ward v. YarnelleIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Moorhouse v. KunkalmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Citizens Loan Trust Co., Exr. v. SandersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Yeoman v. ShaefferIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Johnson v. SherwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API