Legal Opinion

Hobbs v. Tom & Pal

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 5, 1937No. 5293PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Judge.

Plaintiff’s nose was injured when struck by a metal projection arm of an awning which overhung the sidewalk in front of defendants’ place of business on Desiard street in the city of Monroe. The accident occurred about noon on October 12, 193S. At that time plaintiff was standing on the sidewalk, at the western end of the awning, conversing with several other men.

Defendants herein are Tom & Pal, a commercial partnership composed of Thomas Jennings and John (Pal) Jennings, and the individual members of such partnership. The partnership conducts a retail business of selling…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barnes v. BeirneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886
  2. Atkins v. BushSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. Thompson v. Commercial Nat. BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  4. Blanks v. Saenger Theatres, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Vidrine v. Evangeline Gravel Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harvey v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Kalil v. Wolldenroot Operating Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  3. Davison v. American Policyholders Ins.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API