Clark v. State

I respectfully dissent. This is a close case that rests near the line that divides those cases like Hiegel v. State, (1989), Ind.App., 538 N.E.2d 265, Corl v. State (1989), Ind.App., 544 N.E.2d 211; and Mordacq v. State (1992), Ind.App., 585 N.E.2d 22, which find the evidence insufficient to support a conviction for operating while intoxicated from those cases like Bowlin v. State (1975), 164 Ind.App. 693, 330 N.E.2d 353; Rose v. State (1976), 168 Ind.App. 674, 345 N.E.2d 257; Gorland v. State (1983), Ind.App., 452 N.E.2d 1021; and Traxler v. State (1989), Ind.App., 538 N.E.2d 268, which find…