Legal Opinion

Glenn v. Garth

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Motion for reargument.

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

This is a motion for a reargument, made long after the entry of judgment on the remittitur and when we have lost jurisdiction of the case; suggesting no point overlooked; citing no new and pertinent authority, but stoutly and vigorously insisting that the court has gone astray, and that its decision is unsound. We are expected to ask for a return of the remittitur and seek in that manner to retrace our steps and correct an error alleged to be dangerous. Ordinarily, no- more than this would need to be said to justify a denial of the motion; but the case itself is both important and peculiar,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Webster v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Seymour v. . SturgessNew York Court of Appeals · 1862

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  2. Williams v. VreelandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
  3. Hubbell v. HoughtonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1898
  4. Sigua Iron Co. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
  5. California National Supply Co. (A Corporation) v. O'BrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API