Legal Opinion

Brinkley v. Bethel

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1872Published

PROM SHELBY. Appeal in error from the judgment of the Municipal Court, September Term, 1869, Gr. P. Eottte, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, C. J.

In May, 1861, Bethel sold to Brinkley a tract of land in the State of Arkansas and took his three notes, payable in one, two, and three years. At the time Brinkley executed . the notes, Bethel and wife executed and delivered to him a paper purporting to be a deed in fee simple, with covenants of warranty, which was delivered to and accepted by Brinkley as a deed of conveyance. To constitute the paper a conveyance of the fee simple title, a scroll or seal to the names of Bethel and wife was necessary under the laws of Arkansas. This requisite of a deed was omitted and not observed by either…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chapman v. EddySupreme Court of Vermont · 1841

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API