Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CANTUBA v. American Bureau of Shipping

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 2010No. 2008-CA-0497Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBelsome, J.

_|_¡AU seamen aboard the M/V MARIKA perished when the vessel disappeared in a bitter North Atlantic winter storm. As a result of the majority’s decision, the widows and orphaned children of the seamen aboard the M/V MARIKA will forever lose their day in court, without a scintilla of evidence that they knowingly and/or willfully violated a court order.

Although La.Code Civ. Proc. art. 1471 provides that dismissal is a remedy available to courts for a party’s failure to comply with court-ordered discovery, the Louisiana Supreme Court has clarified that dismissal is a draconian penalty and is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Horton v. McCarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Hampton v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Benware v. MeansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  4. Raspanti v. LitchfieldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Columbia Homestead Ass'n v. ArnoultLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API