Legal Opinion
Van Tine Et Ux. v. Cornelius, Admr.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 29, 1946No. Appeal, 236PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Drew,
This action in trespass arose out of a collision on State Highway 219, in McKean County, between a passenger automobile owned and driven by Chester L. Van Tine, and a truck owned by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Highways, and driven by Joseph B. Vecellio. Suit was instituted by Van Tine and his wife, Ruth, against the Administrator of the estate of Vecellio (he having died after the accident but before trial from causes in no way related to the collision), to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by the woman plaintiff, who was a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Giordano v. Clement Martin, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Ferry v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Dougherty v. Merchants Baking CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Flowers v. Dolan, Admrx.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
3Cited by13 opinions
- Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Klein v. HollingsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Ebersole v. BeistlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Joseph P. Makowsky, Administrator of the Estate of Albert Makowsky, Deceased v. Michael Povlick and Robert F. StegmeierCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Sharble v. Kuehnle-Wilson, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.