Jones v. Lustig
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Wertz, J.:
This was an action in which subcontractors sought to foreclose mechanics’ liens for labor and materials supplied in the construction of a dwelling house.
Appellees, Francis and Marguerite Lustig, were the owners of the property on which the improvements were erected. Defendant Bernard Goldstone was appellees’ contractor. Appellant, Michael Zuk, a subcontractor, doing business as Rockhurst Plumbing and Heating Company, filed his cross petition alleging that he furnished labor and material, in a specified amount, for the construction of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clark Lumber Co. v. PassigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Powers v. Badger Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Adair v. Transcontinental Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- F. M. Spalding Lumber Co. v. SlusherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Doane v. BeverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Owen Lumber Co. v. ChartrandSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- D. J. Fair Lumber Co. v. KarlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Ekstrom United Supply Co. v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- Schwaller Lumber Co., Inc. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Mountain Iron & Supply Co. v. BranumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.