Legal Opinion

Bannister v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 26, 1996No. F-95-973Published

1Opinion of the Court

930 P.2d 1176 (1996)

Charles Eugene BANNISTER, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-95-973.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

December 26, 1996.

John D. Echols, Scott D. Keith, and Bryan L. Dupler, Tulsa, for Defendant-Appellant (at trial and on appeal).

Elizabeth A. Pauchnik Laura Austin Thomas Assistant District Attorneys, Stillwater, for the State (at trial).

W.A. Drew Edmondson, Attorney General of Oklahoma and Laronna W. Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Oklahoma City, for Appellee (on appeal).

SUMMARY OPINION

CHAPEL, Vice Presiding Judge.

Charles Eugene Bannister was tried by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knighton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Hockersmith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Bannister v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Cullison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API