Legal Opinion

LaPierre v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Calhoun. (Smith, J.) Negligence cage. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Plaintiff was a brakeman on a local freight train of the defendant, and was injured December 4, 1886, under the following circumstances: The train had reached Vicksburg, where it became necessary to unload some freight. The bottom of the car and the platform were on a level. The heavier freight was placed upon a truck, which the plaintiff wheeled over a gang plank to the platform. While engaged in this work, the end of the gang plank slipped from the car, and plaintiff, with his load, fell to the ground, a distance of about 3-^ feet, whereby he was injured, and, as he claims, permanently. He…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  2. Miller v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Gillette v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Schneider v. Wolverine Portland Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Baker v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API