Legal Opinion
Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of CA v. Howard
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 5, 2022No. 2:20-cv-02109Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BERRY CREEK RANCHERIA OF No. 2:20-CV-2109-JAM-DMC-P MAIDU INDIANS OF CALIFORNIA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. 14 DEBORAH HOWARD, also known as 15 Deborah Brown, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil action. 19 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 12, for entry of a default judgment. 20 21 I. PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS 22 This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s original complaint. See ECF No. 1. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.