Legal Opinion

Watt v. Creppel

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1953No. 20118PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McBRIDE, Judge.

The only question involved in this appeal is whether the plaintiffs have abandoned this suit within the meaning of Act 107 of 1898, amending R.C.C. art. 3519, LSA-C.C., which declares that whenever a plaintiff “shall at any time before obtaining final judgment allow five years to elapse without having taken any steps in the prosecution thereof, he shall be considered as having abandoned the same.”

The suit was filed by the initial plaintiff in January of 1947. Defendants filed exceptions which were overruled on February 14, 1947. They filed answer March 12, 1947. The last step…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Augusta Sugar Co. v. HaleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  2. Lockhart v. LockhartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  3. Edwards v. WhitedSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
  4. Lips v. Royal Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  5. Cambon Bros. v. SuthonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sanders v. LukeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Vigil v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Succession of MoodyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. FAMILY FEDERAL SAV. AND LOAN ASS'N v. HuckabyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Deposit Trust Savings Bank, FSB v. KucharchukLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API