Legal Opinion
Attorney General v. Michigan Public Service Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 1, 2009No. 134667, 134668, 134669, 134671, 134673, 134674,134676 and 134677PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order Entered May 1, 2009:
Leave to appeal having been granted and the briefs and oral arguments of the parties having been considered by the Court, we reverse the July 3, 2007, judgment of the Court of Appeals on the issue of Detroit Edison Company (Edison) recovering a portion of the control premium that DTE Energy paid to acquire MCN Energy, and we affirm the Court of Appeals judgment that “transmission costs” may be recovered through a power supply cost recovery (PSCR) clause on different grounds. The Public Service Commission (PSC) excluded the control premium costs from Edison’s general…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Michigan Employment Relations Commission v. Detroit Symphony Orchestra, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Payne v. MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Detroit Edison Co. ApplicationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Review of Consumers Energy Co. Renewable Energy PlanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- in Re Application of Indiana Michigan Power Co Cert of NecessityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
- In re Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.'s ComplianceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011