Walker v. Arkansas Department of Correction
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
Valerie A. Walker appeals following an adverse jury verdict in her employment-discrimination and retaliation action. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
This court construes Walker’s pro se appeal as challenging the district court’s 1 rulings dismissing several of her claims. See Jackson v. Nixon, 747 F.3d 537, 544 (8th Cir. 2014) (appellate court construes pro se complaint liberally); Greer v. St. Louis Reg’l Med. Ctr., 258 F.3d 843, 846 (8th Cir. 2001) (notice of appeal that specifies final judgment is understood to raise for review all previous rulings). Walker’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Alabama v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Randall Jackson v. Jay NixonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Baker v. ChisomCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Craig Singletary v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tupper v. St. Francois CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023